back to work

Studio Help Center

Turned recurring support questions into a self-service system and a source of product insight.

Led the initiative across content, design, and engineering for a product with more than a million users, then used its search data to find usability problems in the product itself.

My role
Product strategy · IA · CMS design · PM
Team
Cross-functional team plus a contract writer
Timeline
2022

23K+

Article views

9,367

Searches

279

Avg. daily views

Within the first two months after launch. 86 articles mapped, 56 prioritized for launch.

Studio Help Center landing page with the Learn to build search

The 30-second story

Challenge

Give a growing 1M+ user product a centralized self-service resource instead of relying on forum posts, support tickets, and canned replies.

Key move

Organized 86 candidate articles around user workflows, prioritized 56 for launch, and created a repeatable content system.

Evidence

Post-launch search patterns exposed recurring friction around rotate, connect, and hinge, turning support content into product insight.

Result

Reached 23K+ article views and 9,367 searches in the first two months, with 279 average daily views.

Problem

As Studio grew beyond one million users, there was no centralized self-service resource. Users relied on the community forum or email support tickets, while the support team repeatedly answered many of the same questions.

Canned replies improved speed and consistency, but the model remained difficult to scale and gave little visibility into where users actually struggled. A dedicated Help Center could give users a direct path to answers while making recurring questions and high-friction topics visible for the first time.

The canned-reply document used by the support team
The canned-reply document the support team worked from, fast and consistent, but invisible to everyone outside the inbox.

Process

01

Defining the information architecture

Having handled Studio support directly, I had firsthand visibility into recurring questions and user friction. I translated those patterns and key product workflows into a scalable information architecture, mapping 86 potential articles and prioritizing 56 for the initial launch.

I organized the content around key workflows, building, rendering, instruction creation, and sharing, so users could find answers based on what they were trying to accomplish, rather than on how the product was structured internally.

Information architecture mapping 86 articles across Build, Render, Instruction Maker, and Purchasing
All 86 candidate articles, organised by workflow rather than by product structure.
The 56 articles prioritised for the first launch
The 56 articles prioritised for launch, cut down from the full map of 86.

02

Creating a content system

I established a repeatable article format and writing guidelines so the documentation could stay clear and consistent as the Help Center expanded.

The system defined article structure, tone, and review standards, emphasizing short sentences, scannable layouts, plain language, and consistent naming across the product.

A sample article showing the repeatable format
The repeatable article format: feature description, interface description, and inline callouts.

03

Building the operating model

I defined how new articles would be written, reviewed, revised, and published, and how existing documentation would stay aligned with product releases.

I hired an experienced Studio community moderator as a contract writer and navigated the internal contracting and payment process to bring them onboard. I then set the launch scope and coordinated the review workflow across content, engineering, and design.

Outcome

23K article views and 9K searches in two months, plus a new signal for finding usability problems.

The Help Center quickly became a widely used self-service resource, reaching 23,000+ article views and 9,367 searches within its first two months, settling at 279 views a day.

More usefully, it started answering a question support tickets never could: where do users actually get stuck? The top search terms were rotate (298), connect (163), and hinge (104), and the second most-read article of all was “Moving and rotating parts.” Not advanced features. The most foundational building interactions in the product.

That pattern pointed to recurring friction around rotating, connecting, and adding parts, and became an additional signal for identifying usability issues across Studio. turning a support resource into a research instrument.

The rotation friction led to a concrete product change: we implemented a rotation gizmo to make the control more discoverable and help beginner users learn the interaction more easily.

Help Center usage insights: 23K+ article views, 9,367 searches, 279 average daily views, with top search queries and articles
Search and article-view data from the first two months. The queries clustered around foundational building interactions rather than advanced features.